That's 190 women a year if it's the ACOG number and 540 if it's the FDA. All women whose cancer would be upstaged throughout her body if a morcellator is used where it'd be zero if the tumors hadn't metastasized - because the tumors would be removed whole. I can't believe you're the CEO of a website for women's health and you think this is an appropriate risk. You should be on the opposite side of this issue. And I agree that you should have said that you have a financial relationship with the company you're defending.
Comment Reply
That's 190 women a year if it's the ACOG number and 540 if it's the FDA. All women whose cancer would be upstaged throughout her body if a morcellator is used where it'd be zero if the tumors hadn't metastasized - because the tumors would be removed whole. I can't believe you're the CEO of a website for women's health and you think this is an appropriate risk. You should be on the opposite side of this issue. And I agree that you should have said that you have a financial relationship with the company you're defending.
May 23, 2015 - 7:41pmThis Comment
Reply