Uncircumcised isn't the correct term for the natural penis. I'm not "undecapitated" because my head is still attached. Do you refer to natural women as uncircumcised? If it's beneficial for males to get circumcised than it must be extremely beneficial for females to be circumcised seeing as they have more skin to trap bacteria and judging by the massive amount of commercials for yeast infections and vaginal odor and itching, it sounds as if females would greatly benefit from having that extra skin removed. It's just a little snip, right? They wouldn't even remember it! Absolutely ridiculous, right? It's really sad when a doctor, who is supposed to be well educated, has such an ignorant view of the male anatomy.
Comment Reply
Uncircumcised isn't the correct term for the natural penis. I'm not "undecapitated" because my head is still attached. Do you refer to natural women as uncircumcised? If it's beneficial for males to get circumcised than it must be extremely beneficial for females to be circumcised seeing as they have more skin to trap bacteria and judging by the massive amount of commercials for yeast infections and vaginal odor and itching, it sounds as if females would greatly benefit from having that extra skin removed. It's just a little snip, right? They wouldn't even remember it! Absolutely ridiculous, right? It's really sad when a doctor, who is supposed to be well educated, has such an ignorant view of the male anatomy.
October 28, 2012 - 6:32amThis Comment
Reply