You made the following claim in one of your posts on this page:
"I have interviewed hundreds of patients after their circumcision, and I'd be hard pressed to remember more than a few that said they noticed any changes in their sexual pleasure"
Realize that you have only interviewed "hundreds" of patients after being circumcised. These patients obviously got circumcised because the foreskin caused problems for them. HOWEVER, the foreskin DOES NOT NECESSARILY cause problems for EVERY MALE. But that's besides the point.
The two real questions here are:
1) "How many males have you interviewed that were UN-circumcised, that have no problems with their foreskins?"
2) "How many males have you interviewed that 'restored' their foreskins, and prefer it that way?"
The people mentioned in question one and two actually DO exist. You just need to find them and interview them. Obviously they won't be turning into your patients, because they don't need to be circumcised.
You only told part of the story to try and make it seem as if everyone with foreskins seem to eventually "be doomed to bleeding, scarring and downright unpleasant feeling during sex". I am not a doctor, but what you said seems more money-oriented, especially when coming from a doctor who specializes in circumcising people.
Comment Reply
To buffydaddy,
You made the following claim in one of your posts on this page:
"I have interviewed hundreds of patients after their circumcision, and I'd be hard pressed to remember more than a few that said they noticed any changes in their sexual pleasure"
Realize that you have only interviewed "hundreds" of patients after being circumcised. These patients obviously got circumcised because the foreskin caused problems for them. HOWEVER, the foreskin DOES NOT NECESSARILY cause problems for EVERY MALE. But that's besides the point.
The two real questions here are:
1) "How many males have you interviewed that were UN-circumcised, that have no problems with their foreskins?"
2) "How many males have you interviewed that 'restored' their foreskins, and prefer it that way?"
The people mentioned in question one and two actually DO exist. You just need to find them and interview them. Obviously they won't be turning into your patients, because they don't need to be circumcised.
You only told part of the story to try and make it seem as if everyone with foreskins seem to eventually "be doomed to bleeding, scarring and downright unpleasant feeling during sex". I am not a doctor, but what you said seems more money-oriented, especially when coming from a doctor who specializes in circumcising people.
Peter
November 20, 2011 - 9:36pmThis Comment
Reply