Female Genital Mutilation and Male Genital Mutilation can be intrinsically the same thing.
But i fail to see how cutting of one gender is any worse than cutting of another.
Are you going to sit here and tell me that it's acceptable to mutilate a male's genitals simply because female genital mutilation is more severe occasionally?
They're both terrible. One is illegal while the other is common. What separates the two exactly? Not enough to say that mutilating a baby girl is ILLEGAL while mutilating a baby boy should be promoted.
All body parts represent a risk to their owner. Even clitorises/breasts/labias... if cut off... would reduce chances of infection or respective cancers. So stop f****ing trying to validate male genital mutilation by saying it's not comparable to an already illegal female genital mutilation you sexist pigs.
Comment Reply
Female Genital Mutilation and Male Genital Mutilation can be intrinsically the same thing.
But i fail to see how cutting of one gender is any worse than cutting of another.
Are you going to sit here and tell me that it's acceptable to mutilate a male's genitals simply because female genital mutilation is more severe occasionally?
They're both terrible. One is illegal while the other is common. What separates the two exactly? Not enough to say that mutilating a baby girl is ILLEGAL while mutilating a baby boy should be promoted.
All body parts represent a risk to their owner. Even clitorises/breasts/labias... if cut off... would reduce chances of infection or respective cancers. So stop f****ing trying to validate male genital mutilation by saying it's not comparable to an already illegal female genital mutilation you sexist pigs.
March 31, 2010 - 9:24pmThis Comment
Reply