I am merely pointing out that opinions that are based on evidence that is contradicted by facts and evidence are in essence -worthless, whether they come from men or women.
Interesting when your opinions are shown to be contradicted by those facts and evidence, one is accused of spouting venom. Since when is refuted opinion deemed to be the only acceptable when opined by women--especially when they are not the ones having their genitals damaged.
When YOU have had your genitals damaged, then please come back and give us your much-more valuable OPINION, and those opinuions then might have merit. But, ones who HAVE had theirs damaged are not entitled or have important opinions?
Comment Reply
I am merely pointing out that opinions that are based on evidence that is contradicted by facts and evidence are in essence -worthless, whether they come from men or women.
Interesting when your opinions are shown to be contradicted by those facts and evidence, one is accused of spouting venom. Since when is refuted opinion deemed to be the only acceptable when opined by women--especially when they are not the ones having their genitals damaged.
When YOU have had your genitals damaged, then please come back and give us your much-more valuable OPINION, and those opinuions then might have merit. But, ones who HAVE had theirs damaged are not entitled or have important opinions?
March 30, 2010 - 3:59pmThis Comment
Reply