Sounds as though the only treatment Buffydaddy knows for the foreskin is how to cut it off. That's the only thing most US Drs are taught at med school. There are several treatments, surgical and non-surgical, for phimosis to avert any such lacerations. (See http://www.circumstitions.com/phimosis.html for more.) Circumcision is way drastic for a tight frenulum too. As Buffydaddy says "the relief of knowing there would be no anticipated pain, bleeding, and tearing was motivating itself" - which makes these patients bad evidence that circumcision of healthy babies would be similarly beneficial.
What Buffydaddy knows nothing about is the literally billions of men in the world who have never had any trouble with our foreskins, love having them and would do violence to anyone who would try to take them off us. So he needn't go pulling rank against first-hand experience.
Comment Reply
Sounds as though the only treatment Buffydaddy knows for the foreskin is how to cut it off. That's the only thing most US Drs are taught at med school. There are several treatments, surgical and non-surgical, for phimosis to avert any such lacerations. (See http://www.circumstitions.com/phimosis.html for more.) Circumcision is way drastic for a tight frenulum too. As Buffydaddy says "the relief of knowing there would be no anticipated pain, bleeding, and tearing was motivating itself" - which makes these patients bad evidence that circumcision of healthy babies would be similarly beneficial.
What Buffydaddy knows nothing about is the literally billions of men in the world who have never had any trouble with our foreskins, love having them and would do violence to anyone who would try to take them off us. So he needn't go pulling rank against first-hand experience.
March 22, 2010 - 8:32pmThis Comment
Reply