Facebook Pixel

Comment Reply

EmpowHER Guest
Anonymous (reply to Anonymous)

"The most obvious error is that you've repeated the myth that the glans penis keratinises following circumcision. Although often repeated as fact, there is no evidence for this, and the only study to investigate found that the glans of circumcised and uncircumcised penises were equally keratinised (Szabo R. Short RV."

More than any other topic than I've ever discovered, this one is rife with false research, fraud and outright lies. You really have to know who you are relying on to get to the truth. Among the names to watch out for are: Schoen, Wiswell, Morris, W.Bailey, Halperin, Short, Szabo, Bleustein, Moses, Melman, Cohen, Quaintance and Waskett. I notice you have several here.

Cold & Taylor disected the glans penis of cadavers to determine the presence or absence of keritization of circumcised and intact men. They found the surface skin covering the nerve endings was up to 10 times as thick on circumcised men as men that were not circumcised. This keritinized skin covers the nerve endings that are responsible for sexual sensitivity. This disection is the most accurate way to determine this effect.

Frank O'Hara

March 20, 2010 - 10:47am

Reply

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you agree to EmpowHER's terms of service and privacy policy