i personally despise women who treat the foreskin as a defect instead of a natural healthy body part. Thank you for doing your part in stopping the ignorance that so many $$ oriented organizations have created.
Women don't seem to understand that they create more smegma then a man with a foreskin, and that cutting off similar body parts would result in similar "benefits". Yet nobody would ever suggest forcing this on a baby girl and if a man would complain about a woman not being circumcised then he'd be considered the pig.
Again, much appreciated for your contribution in getting Americans to realize that Nature DESIGNED sex, and that we'd be foolish to think we can be making it "better" by cutting pieces of our genitals off.
Comment Reply
i personally despise women who treat the foreskin as a defect instead of a natural healthy body part. Thank you for doing your part in stopping the ignorance that so many $$ oriented organizations have created.
Women don't seem to understand that they create more smegma then a man with a foreskin, and that cutting off similar body parts would result in similar "benefits". Yet nobody would ever suggest forcing this on a baby girl and if a man would complain about a woman not being circumcised then he'd be considered the pig.
Again, much appreciated for your contribution in getting Americans to realize that Nature DESIGNED sex, and that we'd be foolish to think we can be making it "better" by cutting pieces of our genitals off.
February 3, 2010 - 11:53pmThis Comment
Reply